Sunday, February 12, 2012

Saffron Restaurant Review

Most people who attend Kalamazoo College have heard of the infamous “K-Bubble.”  Our students are notorious for being unmotivated and unwilling to leave campus for things like shows, parties, and even restaurants.  Despite this, Saffron, an Indian restaurant located just northwest of campus on West Main, is somewhat of a hot spot for students who do wish to pop the K-Bubble and adventure off-campus.

Saffron, which describes itself as a restaurant of “Fine Dining Indian Cuisine,” has a classy and open atmosphere.  The artificial lighting within the restaurant is dim, but the large windows at the front of the establishment allow for sunlight to stream in and aid in the lighting of the restaurant.  The walls are covered in beautiful pieces of artwork, all of which seem to fit with the restaurant’s Indian theme.  The walls and furniture are mostly dark shades of brown and beige, but bright vibrant oranges and reds pop out periodically as accents.

Saffron offers two distinct dining options.  A lunch buffet is available during the day, running from noon until 2:00 or 2:30 (depending on the day of the week), and the restaurant closes after this is over.  The next few hours are spent preparing for dinner, and Saffron reopens for the evening at 5:00.  I’ve only had the opportunity to eat at Saffron’s lunch buffet, which, despite the high-class atmosphere and expensive price-tag, was altogether unremarkable.

The buffet table, which sat in the center of the restaurant, had only 10 chaffing dishes clustered atop of it.  Upon further inspection, it became clear that almost half of these were filled with side dishes or deserts.  The array of entree choices was limited, and most of the dishes proved to be disappointing.

Two different kinds of rice adorned the buffet table, a yellow one which was dubbed “Saffron Rice” and a white one described as “Plain Basmati Rice.”  However, had it not been for the stark color difference, these two dishes would have been very difficult to tell apart.  The yellow rice was almost flavorless.  The only thing that keeps me from calling it bland was the presence of the plain rice to which I could compare it.  Perhaps this was intentional though; the rices served the purpose of mixing with the other dishes well.  Next to the white rice sat a dish filled with Naan, Indian flatbread.  It was fluffy, flavorful, and delicious; one of the saving graces of the buffet.

There were only two meat options on the table, Tandoori Chicken and Lamb Keema.  The Tandoori Chicken seemed to be made from high quality meat; it was juicy, fresh, and perfectly flaky.  It was definitely one of the more tasty options available, but even this dish had its drawbacks; the seasonings were sparse, usually covering only one side of each chicken cube, and it was sometimes hard to taste the spices at all.  The Lamb Keema, which sat to the left of the Tandoori Chicken on the buffet table, was rather disgusting to look at.  It had the appearance of elementary school cafeteria ground taco meat, complete with a dull film which developed over the top the longer it sat out on the buffet table and a questionable orange liquid that leaked from it onto the rest of my plate.  I decided to sample this unappetizing goop against my better judgement; it was much too tangy for my taste, with the only real distinguishable taste being that of the lamb itself.

The Channa Saag, a dark brown vegetarian dish filled primarily with chick peas, was the spiciest thing on the buffet.  This is not saying much, however, because I could only begin to taste the heat in this dish after a couple of bites.  The Channa Saag had a thick, porridge-like consistency to it.  The chick peas were well-cooked, and though this meal had a full flavor to it, it did not linger; the only perceivable aftertaste was the twang from the spice.

The Mutter Paneer was a similar dish filled with peas and white rectangular lumps that I was later told was a type of cheese.  This had a consistency closer to soup, and was actually quite delicious.  It was not very spicy, and it had two distinct and strong flavors to it, one from the sauce and the spices and one from the peas themselves.  The Mutter Paneer was particularly good when spooned onto a piece of the sensational Naan.

The only cold dish (besides the dessert which I’ll get to later) was an array of fruits and vegetables called Saffron’s Sensational Salad.  Despite this cute wordplay, the salad was anything but sensational.  It was a bizarre mixture of flavors; it paired apples and grapes with onions and tomatoes and covered the whole thing in oil, vinegar, and a spice that may have been pepper.  The ingredients were all visibly fresh and beautiful, but this odd mixture of flavors was not well executed at all.

The final dish which I sampled was the Badami Kheer, an almond rice pudding.  This sweet dessert was absolutely phenomenal.  This was, without a doubt, the highlight of the buffet.  It looked rather unappetizing-- it was white and runny and not well-distinguished from the buffet’s other contents--and I almost passed it up.  The second I tasted the first bite, though, was bliss.  It was rich, sweet, and creamy, with soft pieces of rice and little bits of almonds providing a contrast of texture.  This desert was well worth it, and I was glad that this was the last flavor in my mouth.

The service at Saffron, like the decor and atmosphere, was top-notch.  The servers were friendly and sociable, but also courteous; they did not hover near the tables when they were not needed, allowing the opportunity for serious conversations to bloom between patrons.  The buffet, too, was replenished regularly.  I caught the tail end of it, but fresh food continued to be put out on the buffet table even within five minutes of the buffet’s closing time. 

All in all, Saffron had a strange dichotomy about it.  It was well-maintained, the food was fresh, and the atmosphere was positive and peaceful.  Despite all of these things, though, the food was, for the most part, unsatisfying.  The few good dishes were not enough to counter-balance the general blandness and lack of choices that the buffet had, and it’s doubtful that I would go back of my own accord.

10 comments:

  1. Hey Kira, this is quite good. I really got a sense of the restaurant and the way you felt about it- there were positive elements, primarily environmental ones, but the food was unimpressive. I like how much attention you paid to the actual food, and the sentence structure that you sued to set up each of the statements you made, making connections to external elements such as the name, or the way it appeared, or how it was the only genre of its kind presented on the buffet. I also like how you started out with a physical description of the decoration and feel of the restaurant, but I thought this part was a bit too descriptive, it simply laid out the physical elements of the decor, maybe you could analyze each item you describe a bit more and speak to how it contributed to the overall positive ambiance that you conclude at the end. Overall I think you touch on all of the elements of a great critique, and upon review this will be really awesome :)
    Charlotte

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was a very well developed critique. I appreciated your straightforwardness and explanation of the poor quality of the food. I also really appreciate this review because I had always heard that the Saffron lunch buffet was very good, but have never been. Now if I ever get the chance to go, your vivid descriptions of the atmosphere and food will likely stick with me. Wonderfully well done.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kira,
    I like the way you described the restaurant. I've never been, and thanks to you, I feel like I know this restaurant.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought that your descriptions of the food were really great and I definitely would now know what to avoid if I ever went to the lunch buffet. I also like that I could really see you saying all of these things, so your personality really came through. I would have liked to see a price, and perhaps a mention of dinner prices. Also, I felt that there should have been a comment on what type of people were at the lunch buffet. Overall, I enjoyed it very much.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your food descriptions were terrific and it was great that you were able to sample so much. You did a great job describing the taste and appearance of each dish, as well as their location on the buffet table. I felt you could have added a little more to the environment, specifically the number and type of people present. I also wanted to know more about price and about the dinner menu. Great job overall.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kira,

    Your "but" is definetly clear. Your food descriptions and judgement are really good. Your opinion in this piece is very strong. I want to know where this place was and how it was. I can imagine the food, but not the place, neither the people who was there.Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kira,

    I thought that your imagery was really good throughout this whole piece. As a reader, I really got a good vision of what the food was like at the restaurant. I can't wait to talk about it in class!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I liked how you set the scene of the piece by physically describing the restaurant. The food descriptions were great as well, as they were detailed and very honest. I definitely understood the "but" of your review. In the end of the review, I liked the short summary that was kind of an advice piece to the reader. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I may be biased, but your review seemed quite harsh--the first things we as readers heard about the food was "it was unremarkable" and "dissatisfying." While you did back up your opinion as you continued through the piece, as a reader I felt that it would influence the rest of the descriptions. It was as if we were to expect that the food was awful no matter what.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think you did a great job with describing the food and that effectively showed your strong opinions and taste of the food. I have been to Saffron and i must say, it really interesting to hear another person's point of view.

    ReplyDelete